So today was my CBC Radio interview on adventure racing and... I don't think I did well. I know some people will say, "Oh c'mon, you always say that" but hear me out. I *do* like the interview I did for
Mark Arnold's Adventure Racing podcast (Episode 3) so I can be positive sometimes! :)
I arrived in a mildly nervous state but when I entered the CBC building, my heart rate shot through the roof. I am a huge, longtime CBC Radio fan. (For some Americans, maybe NPR brings out equivalent feelings?) Inside the building, there were 10' high photos of CBC personalities. The CBC museum was across the hall from the security desk where I checked in. I thought I saw Jian Ghomeshi whiz past me in sunglasses. I was sweating; I started yoga breathing to relax,1,2,3,4,5...
The CBC people I dealt with were super friendly and highly professional. Every day they bring in people who have never been on the radio, don't know the correct way to sit near a microphone (not in front of your mouth, I learned), pop their "p" sounds and get nervous. They made me feel comfortable instantly - phew. While waiting, I had the choice of sitting in the open office, the green room or the control room where the sound engineer was managing dozens of screens and controls to record the interview before mine. The latter was clearly the coolest opportunity!
The host, Mary Ito, is a master of using words and facial expressions to encourage the interviewee; she made me feel as if everything I said was fascinating, even when I knew it wasn't.
So what went wrong? (Man, I would love another chance because I learned so much!) In the pre-interview with the producer, we explored a wide range of topics. By the end, I felt we'd covered much of what adventure racing is all about. But in the real interview, there is much less time. The host focuses on the pieces of the pre-interview that the show's staff felt would be most interesting to their audience. There's no time for the complete picture. Unlike a regular conversation, you generally don't get to return to a topic if you left something out in your first answer. (Like when I explained what AR was and neglected to mention that it included navigation - urgh...)
I knew that's how it would work so I should have thought more about the key concepts I wanted to get across. Politicians are great at giving brief answers to questions then steering the conversation to related topics. On the other hand, I know that radio hosts and editors are skilled at thwarting that technique so maybe it wouldn't have worked anyway!
My engineering brain is a hindrance. I answer questions literally when sometimes I could skim over topics I'd rather spend less time on. Also, my tendency is to go into too much detail. (If you read my log, you already know this.) When I write freelance, I have to do a lot of editing and compressing after the first draft but if I get too detailed on the radio, it means that I only get to tell the first part of the story. For example, in describing the Giant's Rib Raid, I don't think I got beyond planning the maps before it was time to move on to the next topic. Every answer should have been an "elevator speech" with the most important points packed up front. (Much of this entry is a "note to self" in case I ever do another interview but maybe it will be useful to someone else.)
Bottom line... I think the interview will turn out to be more about me than I'd expected rather than the sport in general. They were interested in the fact that I dropped phys ed when I was 12 and only got back into sports as a masters athlete. They were interested in danger, injuries and death in AR - as the general public often is - also the challenge, competitiveness and the long races. I can't remember if I ever said AR was *fun* or expressed my passion for the sport and the lifestyle. I also wanted to stress how accessible it is. I kept thinking I'd get to this stuff but then the time ran out. That's why I think I blew it. It wasn't the producer's or interviewer's fault; in fact, from their point of view, it probably went OK. I feel badly because I failed to convey the big picture of what makes AR so amazing. Regardless, it was a cool experience. Just wish I'd done a better job.