Register | Login
Attackpoint AR - performance and training tools for adventure athletes

Training Log Archive: Anna

In the 7 days ending Aug 11, 2006:

activity # timemileskm+m
  running6 4:23:17 29.92(8:48) 48.15(5:28)
  orienteering3 2:52:44 3.67 5.9
  cycling1 18:53
  Total6 7:34:54 33.58 54.05

«»
1:40
0:00
» now
SaSuMoTuWeThFr

Friday Aug 11, 2006 #

orienteering race (Prologue) 23:15 [4]

orienteering race (Chase) 51:48 [4]

running warm up/down 20:08 [3] 2.24 mi (8:59 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

Thursday Aug 10, 2006 #

orienteering race (Stampede) 53:58 [3]
shoes: soccer shoes

running warm up/down 14:41 [3] 1.63 mi (9:01 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

Wednesday Aug 9, 2006 #

cycling 18:53 [2]

Borrowed Rudy's bike and took the campground road to Happy Jack Trail, to Tie City Campground. This includes the whole ride there, but I didn't count most of the ride back since there was so much coasting downhill.

running (Happy Jack map) 29:08 [3] *** 3.24 mi (9:00 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

Started at the corner of the Happy Jack map. Ran the trail out to get used to it a little and read the contours looking through the woods. When I got near these 2 rock features, I stopped my watch while I walked around and picked out each black triangle and bare rock area. The most important things I learned:
1-Bare rock on contours is as noticable as boulders on the ground, although it's not as eye-catching on the map.
2-Single boulders aren't very useful.
3-The contours are the most helpful when things get confusing.
4-Rocky areas are hard to run through.

Then I took a rough bearing through the woods to a wide saddle. The light green was hard to run through, with sticks down and stuff. I ended up where I wanted, in the open field. The contours were a lot more subtle than they appeared to me on the map, and I was confused for a second.
I was running down a broad spur then, reading the vegetation. At first it was tough because I didn't make the distinction between rough open and open w/ scattered trees. I got more confident when I figured that out and then was able to pick out the individual areas of white.

Tuesday Aug 8, 2006 #

running 50:45 [3] 5.34 mi (9:30 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

Slow run with John, my first since getting up to this altitude. At first my legs felt fine but I was breathing really hard, but then my legs started to feel it, too. I'm not sure if it was the altitude or the hills. Probably a combination of both. Anyway, I'm not sure of the pace since I wasn't feeling like normal. For sure slower than 9 min/mile.

Sunday Aug 6, 2006 #

running warm up/down 57:09 [3] 6.87 mi (8:19 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

to and from Forest Park with John. Legs felt a little tired on the way there, but it was a nice cooldown on the way back since I needed to loosen up.

orienteering (Night sprint) 22:07 [4] *** 3.1 km (7:08 / km)
shoes: New Balance 767

3:20
2:58
4:53
1:29
1:14
1:05
1:26
2:12
3:28

orienteering 21:36 [4] *** 2.8 km (7:43 / km)
shoes: New Balance 767

Legs felt tight at beginning from sitting after first sprint, but I warmed up and then took it a little easier than I had on the first one.
43
5:10
4:52
2:10
1:07
1:31
1:03
3:51
1:11

Saturday Aug 5, 2006 #

running warm up/down 1:11:11 [2] 7.49 mi (9:30 / mi)
shoes: New Balance 767

Got to the race 17 min before start, registered, and tried to get a good warmup in. We didn't warm up as a team since I had to go to the bathroom, Ali takes a long time with her shoes, and Jenny doesn't always keep up. Then we had to choose between striders and stretching, and I did striders while Ali stretched. They did get 2 rushed striders in. Not a good way to prepare for a race.
We did do a quick cooldown together while we watched the boys race. Phillips beat Andy, but Brian beat Phillips.
I thought it would just be another short jog home, but it ended up longer than I expected. I didn't mind, but I know it might not be a good thing to do after a race.

running race 20:15 [5] 5.0 km (4:03 / km)
shoes: new spikes

Pretty good race for me. The course was really flat, and it was 3x the same loop. The footing was a little tricky in some places, but that's an advantage for me.
6:20, 6:38, 6:44. Then my finish split, but I didn't stop my watch, and I'm too lazy to do the math.
Disappointing pace-wise. I didn't get passed at all, so at least I didn't slow down as much as the people I passed. Good to have a course like this because when I slow down on other courses, I know that the miles aren't identical, so I tell myself I probably didn't slow down that much. I thought of holding back on the first mile, but everyone else was getting tired from going out too fast, and I wanted to pass them. I think that Mikecz's rule of starting to pass halfway through is a good one. That'll also help me psychologically because that's how I raced during track season. I'm also not afraid of running in the back anymore.
I ended up getting second place; that junior from Marquette beat me, and I didn't see her the whole race.

« Earlier | Later »