Note
Middle Planning.
By last summer I had two nice courses, test run, and ready to go. Karel, Lorna and I had identified two nice TV legs, one in the open and one in a bowl in the pine forest at what became men’s 4. The SEA had insisted on a long run in through the field (like the 6-day), because the approach we used was “totally unsuited to WOC”. Then the SEA changed, and the fun began.
It started well, we were allowed to use the southern approach to the castle and the courses reached peak quality. Then in July I was forced to change the TV legs to two NS legs on a course running SN, and to take the courses through more of the open felling. I prepared seven different options, all rejected without comment, and decided to resign. Eventually a compromise was hammered out where essentially the SEA planned the men’s course and I did the women’s, provided they fitted around the men.
The course started into tough low visibility heather, the control protected by a big hill which pushed runners off line, then another tricky leg in rough going, so by 2 most of the runners had made some mistake. A short leg to 3 set up the long leg which had many, balanced choices. Four controls in the brash were then needed for TV1. After the TV control came the trickiest section through the low visibility section, with legs diagonal across the slope and controls sites in negative features chosen to be off the natural easy-running lines. Again many errors here. 13-14 brought a change of pace through nice beech forest, to twist the course back on itself for the TV leg, then an easy leg out of the TV, which worked better when the TV leg ran SN.
Very fast running from here on, and the idea was to have a series of legs which were slightly harder than they looked, when the runners were in oxygen debt. I had thought errors of 10-20 seconds were likely here, similar to errors on sprint Courses. I hadn’t expected was the meltdown of Emma Johansson and Thierry on what was essentially and orange course control. It’s not over till it’s over.
The whole planning team felt the men’s course lacked subtlety. I don’t understand where the challenge was meant to be on most of the legs: certainly the men made far fewer mistakes.
At the end of the day Billstam and Hubmann won. I’m delighted with the outcome. Of course they are great orienteers, BIllstam is inspirational in rolling back the years, and I owed her after I unjustly accused her of being W40 on nopesport. Hubmann was also an excellent ambassador for us at Race the Castles, and alone of the international contingent he stayed for the prizegiving at the Scottish Champs.
Note
It’s not over until it’s over.
“There is no such thing as a difficult control…what is difficult is judging the safe speed”. For the top elites, all navigation is easy, so to make he course challenging I wanted to change the required style as often as possible. I knew there would be a long, dead, run back to the castle towards the end of the middle, and was keen to have something non-trivial to challenge the oxygen-deprived.
Initially this involved tree and paddocks, but eventually it was a small garden and some sprint-style “left right left” “bridge-gate-hedge”. I had thought this would induce some 10-20 sec errors, but never imagined Thierry and Emma failing to make the turns and going so far into the horrible undergrowth when the map showed white forest. The tracks created by early runners probably didn’t help.