Note
just in, from the Dept. of Irrelevant and Super-Trivial Info: In 2002, my Pere Marquette time was 1:20:41. I was 50 years old, 15th in the 50-59 age group.
Now I'm a bettter runner. At least when I'm not walking uphill, which I did more of this year than the last few. More hill repeats, cried the prisoners.
It was the speed training that won the age group for me, though, I would trade places w the second place guy on the hills, but in the last 1 1/2 miles I was able to 'empty myself' a bit as Eric said, and kick it in.
In talking to the winners of M65-69, and M70-74, a pattern seems to emerge. Very little running until age 50. Why successful now? Perhaps not as physically beat up as someone running/training hard all their life? Or mentally able to delight and be encouraged by times which would discourage a faster runner who was slowing down?